git for mail (was: Git)

[martin f krafft]

also sprach chombee <chombee at nerdshack.com> [2007.11.27.1416 +0100]:
> I'm not sure if I will bother to use git or not. Depends how 
> much hassle it is. Synchronisers like offlineimap make me 
> queasy though. It is fairly easy to destroy all your email. 

I've been using offlineimap since it came out and have never lost
mail.

> Say something goes wrong on a client, and your email gets 
> deleted or moved or something on that client.

I guess if you cannot rule out that "something goes wrong on
a client" you should switch clients or offlineimap isn't for you...

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
"i worked myself up from nothing to a state of extreme poverty."
                                                       -- groucho marx
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL: <http://lists.madduck.net/pipermail/vcs-home/attachments/20071127/299fd045/attachment.pgp>