I am using fsvs and just found svnhome in google...

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Juliano F. Ravasi <ml at juliano.info> [2008.08.26.2207 +0100]:
> > If you are fine with the slow speed and all the other limitations
> > of Subversion, give it a shot. I haven't, and I wouldn't touch it
> > because I don't trust Subversion.
> 
> Gratuitous Subversion bashing?

Not intended, no.

> May I ask why you don't "trust" Subversion?

It has corrupted my repositories often. I was using Subversion for
about 3 or 4 years.

> What? Are you sure you meant that? You can't use the filesystem if
> you are not connected?

So you have a centralised repository. What do you do when you are on
an airplane? How do you write to the filesystem?

> distribution is needed). In fact, I already knew that git and hg
> would fail for the task, since I already knew them very well for
> SCM before starting my vcs-home experiments.

I use Git for homedir versioning. How does it fail for you?

> code projects (only files and not directories are important, no
> need to support unicode filenames, most files are very small,
> etc). That is

Git supports unicode filenames and binary files as large as you want
them.

Anyway, as I said a couple of times in all different places: use the
tool that suits you. You wanted feedback on fsvs and I told you what
I thought of it. I am also interested in what your experiences are
or will be!

-- 
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
 
http://lavender.cime.net/~ricky/badgers.txt
 
spamtraps: madduck.bogus at madduck.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
URL: <http://lists.madduck.net/pipermail/vcs-home/attachments/20080826/6d0bfb9e/attachment.pgp>